Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f272/1f272bd1a138ca84276ad9995fc74f68f03e2aa7" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58ad8/58ad8beaf10ab1e997eee3fd9d70d871d24d2ac7" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front"
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Fujifilm S9200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-FC150 was unveiled 5 years prior to the Fujifilm S9200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-FC150 matches up against the Fujifilm S9200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Fujifilm S9200
EX-FC150 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Casio EX-FC150
Fujifilm S9200 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 50 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Fujifilm S9200
EX-FC150 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 comes with exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9200 has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FC150 versus Fujifilm S9200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the Fujifilm S9200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fc46/7fc46c6f91a5935219260d1b5b339984246636ea" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and Fujifilm S9200 is 93 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54256/5425606d524bfa8ca3e7d047b2b07945ac9cb909" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and Fujifilm S9200.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Fujifilm S9200 to give you extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db800/db80042ff9ec103e403ddd61367f8aa6e3ce5ad5" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59392/59392031c6c1d23f0b879ccc451652e86900d2c6" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 7.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lb) | 670 grams (1.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 shots |
Battery style | - | AA |
Battery ID | NP-40 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $350 | $300 |