Casio EX-FC150 vs Kodak C135
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Casio EX-FC150 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC150 vs Kodak C135 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Kodak C135, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Kodak. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and C135 (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FC150 was unveiled 3 years before the C135 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-FC150 matches up vs the C135 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC150 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Kodak EasyShare C135. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Kodak C135
| EX-FC150 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Crisper display (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-FC150
| C135 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 26 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Kodak C135
| EX-FC150 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 provides outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Kodak C135 has measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FC150 versus Kodak C135 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 vs the C135.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and C135 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and C135.
As you can see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak C135 to resolve more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FC150 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-11-16 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 112k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $0 |