Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200
93 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and S8200 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FC150 was announced 21 months earlier than the S8200 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-FC150 grades against the S8200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Nikon Coolpix S8200. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Nikon S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Nikon S8200
| EX-FC150 | S8200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Casio EX-FC150
| S8200 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 961k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+731k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Nikon S8200
| EX-FC150 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 has got exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Nikon S8200 has measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the S8200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and S8200 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The image below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and S8200.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Nikon S8200 to result in extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon S8200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-11-16 | 2011-08-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 25-350mm (14.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 961 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 213 grams (0.47 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $329 |