Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon D200
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
55 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon D200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 920g - 147 x 113 x 74mm
- Released February 2006
- Earlier Model is Nikon D100
- Newer Model is Nikon D300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon D200 Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Casio EX-FC150 versus Nikon D200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the D200 (10MP) is relatively similar but the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and D200 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FC150 was manufactured 3 years later than the D200 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Nikon D200 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the D200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon D200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Nikon D200. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Nikon D200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Nikon D200
| EX-FC150 | D200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2009 |  | February 2006 | More recent by 46 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Nikon D200 over the Casio EX-FC150
| D200 | EX-FC150 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Nikon D200
| EX-FC150 | D200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon D200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 has got outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Nikon D200 has dimensions of 147mm x 113mm x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") with a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC150 versus Nikon D200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the D200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and D200 is 93 and 55 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon D200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and D200.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-FC150 has the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field more challenging. The more recent EX-FC150 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon D200 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon D200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon D200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon D200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-11-16 | 2006-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Nikon F |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 309 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.63x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 920 grams (2.03 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 113 x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 583 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | EN-EL3e |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 to 20 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $350 | $999 |