Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II
93 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FC150 was brought out 6 years before the E-M10 II and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-FC150 grades versus the E-M10 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| EX-FC150 | E-M10 II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Casio EX-FC150
| E-M10 II | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2015 | November 2009 | More recent by 70 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus E-M10 II
| EX-FC150 | E-M10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 against the E-M10 II.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and E-M10 II is 93 and 82 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC150 and E-M10 II.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-FC150 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-11-16 | 2015-08-25 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 107 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $499 |