Clicky

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
20
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs

Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
  • 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released November 2009
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Released August 2015
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-FC150 was brought out 6 years before the E-M10 II and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-FC150 grades versus the E-M10 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 EX-FC150 E-M10 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Casio EX-FC150

 E-M10 II EX-FC150 
ReleasedAugust 2015November 2009More recent by 70 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus E-M10 II

 EX-FC150 E-M10 II 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 against the E-M10 II.

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and E-M10 II is 93 and 82 respectively.

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC150 and E-M10 II.

As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-FC150 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography advice
25
manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
71
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 Street photography features
Olympus E-M10 II Street photography features
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
82
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
features touch focus
good high ISO (25,600)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography highlights
30
fast shooting (40.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
66
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-FC150
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 II
50
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
73
features touch focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography highlights
31
manual focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
79
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M10 II as a Vlogging camera
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not the best (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
does not feature selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone jack
35
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus E-M10 II
 Casio Exilim EX-FC150Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-FC150 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2009-11-16 2015-08-25
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 64 200
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 81
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 37-185mm (5.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.6-4.5 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Available lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.62x
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/1000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 40.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 2.60 m 5.80 m (ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 173 grams (0.38 pounds) 390 grams (0.86 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 842
Other
Battery life - 320 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-40 BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $350 $499