Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FC150 was revealed 11 months later than the SP-565UZ which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the SP-565UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-FC150 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2009 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Casio EX-FC150
| SP-565UZ | EX-FC150 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-FC150 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 has got exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC150 vs the SP-565UZ.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and SP-565UZ is 93 and 72 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and SP-565UZ.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photos although you should always factor the age of the products into consideration. The more recent EX-FC150 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-11-16 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $400 |
