Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus 9000
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FC150 was released 7 months after the 9000 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus 9000
| EX-FC150 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2009 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-FC150
| 9000 | EX-FC150 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus 9000
| EX-FC150 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 vs the 9000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and 9000.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus 9000 to offer more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern EX-FC150 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also Known as | - | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-11-16 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $350 | $300 |