Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SH-3
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus SH-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsAppThe EX-FC150 was revealed 7 years prior to the SH-3 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-FC150 scores against the SH-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus SH-3
EX-FC150 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Casio EX-FC150
SH-3 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | November 2009 | More modern by 75 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus SH-3
EX-FC150 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 offers outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus SH-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the SH-3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and SH-3 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and SH-3.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-3 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-11-16 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $350 | $579 |