Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-310
93 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-310, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe EX-FC150 was announced 13 months earlier than the TG-310 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-FC150 matches up versus the TG-310 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus TG-310
| EX-FC150 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Casio EX-FC150
| TG-310 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | November 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-310
| EX-FC150 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the TG-310.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and TG-310 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC150 and TG-310.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-310 to resolve extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $0 |