Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-320
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FC150 was launched 3 years earlier than the TG-320 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-FC150 matches up vs the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus TG-320
EX-FC150 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-FC150
TG-320 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | November 2009 | More modern by 26 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-320
EX-FC150 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display measurements | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC150 offers physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and TG-320.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus TG-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $350 | $0 |