Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and TG-610 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FC150 was launched 13 months prior to the TG-610 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-FC150 matches up against the TG-610 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Olympus TG-610. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus TG-610
| EX-FC150 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Casio EX-FC150
| TG-610 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-610
| EX-FC150 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 offers outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 vs the TG-610.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and TG-610 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The image here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC150 and TG-610.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-610 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus TG-610 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-11-16 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $350 | $223 |
