Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f272/1f272bd1a138ca84276ad9995fc74f68f03e2aa7" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-810, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and TG-810 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-FC150 was introduced 21 months prior to the TG-810 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the TG-810 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Olympus TG-810. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus TG-810
EX-FC150 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-FC150
TG-810 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 21 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-810
EX-FC150 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 has got outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-810 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the TG-810.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ede6/3ede6121f3df77fcdf15e872b91e4419f7f7f23c" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and TG-810 is 93 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efb17/efb174327b9f916fa815fc79e573209edb1c60d5" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and TG-810.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-810 to produce more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8593c/8593ca148c71d19d2c48c343a1a202b8e3e178d3" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f270b/f270b75be005ed9e58ee37ceee861c90d4baf94c" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus TG-810 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173g (0.38 lb) | 215g (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $350 | $428 |