Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched November 2009
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FC150 was revealed 5 years earlier than the TG-3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-FC150 grades versus the TG-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus TG-3
| EX-FC150 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Casio EX-FC150
| TG-3 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 53 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-3
| EX-FC150 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 comes with external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FC150 against the TG-3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and TG-3 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-3 to provide extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-FC150
Street photography with Olympus TG-3
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Sports photography camera
high max fps (40.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
great battery life (330 per charge)
slow frames per second (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
great battery life (330 per charge)
environment proof
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
environment proof
great battery life (330 shots)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-11-16 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173g (0.38 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $350 | $350 |