Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VG-160
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and VG-160 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FC150 was announced 3 years prior to the VG-160 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-FC150 matches up versus the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus VG-160
EX-FC150 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Casio EX-FC150
VG-160 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | November 2009 | More recent by 26 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VG-160
EX-FC150 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 has got outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the VG-160.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and VG-160 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and VG-160.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus VG-160 to show greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 7cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173g (0.38 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 165 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $350 | $90 |