Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-340
Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FC150 was unveiled 3 years prior to the VR-340 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-FC150 grades versus the VR-340 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus VR-340
| EX-FC150 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Casio EX-FC150
| VR-340 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 26 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VR-340
| EX-FC150 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 features physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the VR-340.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and VR-340 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and VR-340.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-340 to render extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography information
focusing manually
no manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (125g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography highlights
fast continuous shooting (40.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography highlights
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography details
focusing manually
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Vlogging features
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone jack
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-11-16 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $130 |