Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f272/1f272bd1a138ca84276ad9995fc74f68f03e2aa7" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2dcc/c2dccc339151be15969ec6f5278f594ec973c860" alt="Pentax MX-1 front Pentax MX-1 front"
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is very well matched but the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-FC150 was brought out 4 years before the MX-1 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FC150 matches up vs the MX-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Pentax MX-1
EX-FC150 | MX-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Casio EX-FC150
MX-1 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 44 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Pentax MX-1
EX-FC150 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax MX-1 has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FC150 against the MX-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7184/c718484e95a172e2351718944e0408f0cf748f7c" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and MX-1 is 93 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22227/222276f6e1e3531b84ce2eb0d4bb34a35357ebce" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and MX-1.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-FC150 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Pentax MX-1 will give you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fae7a/fae7a67b029585c6892a2bbf87b6c4e9b52fe503" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/234d2/234d211491d99356dec5a5e4cf1b8fd49bfa2049" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Pentax MX-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-11-16 | 2013-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173 gr (0.38 lb) | 391 gr (0.86 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $350 | $400 |