Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310, both Waterproof cameras and both are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6020 was released 11 months before the TG-310 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 6020 grades vs the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus TG-310
| 6020 | TG-310 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus 6020
| TG-310 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Olympus TG-310
| 6020 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the 6020 versus the TG-310.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and TG-310 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and TG-310.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-310 to show more detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older 6020 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography info
decent MP (13 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus 6020 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competitors in class (122g)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus 6020 Sports photography information
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography information
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13MP)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
max fps low (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery pack (150 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus 6020
Travel photography with Olympus TG-310
lighter than competitors in class (122g)
weather proof
decent MP (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
environment proofing
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
low battery pack (150 CIPA)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus 6020
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-310
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13MP)
weather proof
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low battery pack (150 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus 6020
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (122g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic port
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $279 | $0 |