Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh CX1
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Casio EX-FC150 versus Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is very similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FC150 was announced 9 months later than the CX1 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-FC150 scores against the CX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Ricoh CX1
| EX-FC150 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2009 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-FC150
| CX1 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh CX1
| EX-FC150 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC150 versus Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FC150 and the CX1.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and CX1 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and CX1.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-FC150 to offer greater detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer EX-FC150 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173g (0.38 pounds) | 180g (0.40 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $299 |