Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-20
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-FC150 versus Ricoh WG-20, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WG-20 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC150 was unveiled 5 years prior to the WG-20 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-FC150 scores versus the WG-20 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-FC150 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-FC150
| WG-20 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 51 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-FC150 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 features outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FC150 versus Ricoh WG-20 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC150 against the WG-20.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and WG-20 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and WG-20.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-20 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lbs) | 164 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $350 | $370 |