Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f272/1f272bd1a138ca84276ad9995fc74f68f03e2aa7" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Ricoh WG-30W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The EX-FC150 was brought out 5 years prior to the WG-30W and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the WG-30W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Ricoh WG-30W. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Ricoh WG-30W
EX-FC150 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Casio EX-FC150
WG-30W | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 59 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-30W
EX-FC150 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 provides physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30W has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FC150 versus Ricoh WG-30W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the WG-30W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3c34/c3c3438ed337f4aa4019fc7aff193390553e92b0" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and WG-30W is 93 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dd2e/4dd2e986e5a1259f8fc63f58f38479a4c1c328dd" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through specs. The photograph here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and WG-30W.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to provide you with greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4405b/4405b17342cf127f18cdab3c21b351a9649ecbb7" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f9bc/9f9bc1d9970b01e65a10619f7bdf2ca6d558ac89" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-30W |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-11-16 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $350 | $280 |