Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f272/1f272bd1a138ca84276ad9995fc74f68f03e2aa7" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-FC150 was released 6 years prior to the WG-5 GPS which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-FC150 matches up versus the WG-5 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-FC150 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Casio EX-FC150
WG-5 GPS | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 63 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-FC150 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adb24/adb244ef61c8bd9704b089325f305d9c6a6d3989" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and WG-5 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23bbc/23bbcec7d7839ca5042e0f943a25d82446ff3381" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The pic underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09b49/09b49d42f75481a6c7938452c3f79b540e94ec5a" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1471/a14715c558761873a26ec68e9abaa096041d6252" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-11-16 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173 gr (0.38 pounds) | 236 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $350 | $500 |