Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC150 was brought out 5 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FC150 matches up versus the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-FC150 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-FC150
| WG-M1 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 58 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-FC150 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 has outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-FC150 against the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and WG-M1.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173g (0.38 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $350 | $2,000 |