Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202
Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Portability
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FC150 was brought out 10 months later than the SL202 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-FC150 grades versus the SL202 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-FC150 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2009 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 10 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-FC150
| SL202 | EX-FC150 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung SL202
| EX-FC150 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 offers outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the SL202.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and SL202 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and SL202.
All in all, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you may want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern EX-FC150 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-FC150
Portrait photography with Samsung SL202
you can focus manually
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
comes with face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-FC150
Street photography with Samsung SL202
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-FC150
Sports photography with Samsung SL202
fast shooting (40.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Travel photography information
Samsung SL202 Travel photography information
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Landscape photography factors
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
reasonably wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Vlogging features
Samsung SL202 Vlogging features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic port
reasonably wide (28mm)
comes with face detection focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 gr (0.38 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $140 |