Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST65
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FC150 versus Samsung ST65, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FC150 was manufactured 14 months earlier than the ST65 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-FC150 grades versus the ST65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung ST65
EX-FC150 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-FC150
ST65 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | November 2009 | Newer by 14 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung ST65
EX-FC150 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC150 has got exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 versus Samsung ST65 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the ST65.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and ST65 is 93 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and ST65.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST65 to give greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung ST65 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $350 | $130 |