Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST700
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-FC150 versus Samsung ST700, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and ST700 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FC150 was unveiled 13 months prior to the ST700 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the ST700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Samsung ST700. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung ST700
EX-FC150 | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Casio EX-FC150
ST700 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | November 2009 | More recent by 13 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung ST700
EX-FC150 | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 has physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Samsung ST700 has sizing of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC150 versus Samsung ST700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the ST700.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and ST700 is 93 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC150 and ST700.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung ST700 to offer you greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung ST700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung ST700 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-11-16 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173 gr (0.38 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $350 | $280 |