Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FC150 was announced 14 months prior to the ST95 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-FC150 scores versus the ST95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung ST95
| EX-FC150 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-FC150
| ST95 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | November 2009 | Fresher by 14 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung ST95
| EX-FC150 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 has got external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the ST95.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and ST95 is 93 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and ST95.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung ST95 to provide extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung ST95 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-11-16 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $350 | $145 |