Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung TL225
Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed November 2009
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Also Known as ST550
Picsart Introduces AI-Powered Tools to Challenge Canva's Dominance Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-FC150 versus Samsung TL225, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Incredible Footage Reveals Eagle Attacking Drone in Mid-Flight ShowdownThe EX-FC150 was introduced 4 months later than the TL225 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-FC150 matches up against the TL225 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Guns 'N' Roses Photographer Alleges Sexual Harassment and Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-FC150 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-FC150
| TL225 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung TL225
| EX-FC150 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2009 |  | August 2009 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC150 has exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FC150 versus Samsung TL225 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the TL225.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and TL225 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC150 and TL225.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung TL225 to render greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photographer loses 7-year business to crafty scammers on Facebook Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Portrait photography information
Samsung TL225 Portrait photography information
you can focus manually
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Scarlett Johansson Stakes Legal Claim Over Her Digital AvatarStreet Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Street photography highlights
Samsung TL225 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch focus
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than competitors (187g)
Is Apple's Latest 'Shot on iPhone' Video Deceptive?Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-FC150
Sports photography with Samsung TL225
high frames per second (40.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
The highly-anticipated Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS Sports is finally hereTravel Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Travel photography features
Samsung TL225 Travel photography features
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
includes touch focus
flash built-in
relatively wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (187g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
NASA photographer chronicles decades-long effort constructing James Webb Space TelescopeLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Landscape photography features
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography features
you can focus manually
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
relatively wide (27mm)
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Australia's Largest Photography Festival to Feature AI-Generated Images for the First TimeVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Vlogging details
Samsung TL225 Vlogging details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic jack
relatively wide (27mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (187 grams)
Hasselblad and Oppo Join Forces to Create Next-Level 'HyperTone' Camera
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung TL225 |
| Alternate name | - | ST550 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-11-16 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lb) | 187 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $350 | $488 |
