Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released November 2011
- Later Model is Olympus E-PM2
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the E-PM1 (12MP) is pretty similar but the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-4000 was manufactured 3 years before the E-PM1 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the FE-4000 scores vs the E-PM1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus PEN E-PM1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-PM1
FE-4000 | E-PM1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus FE-4000
E-PM1 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 28 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-PM1
FE-4000 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM1 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the FE-4000 against the E-PM1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and E-PM1 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The picture underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and E-PM1.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The FE-4000 provides the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF more challenging. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Otherwise known as | X-925 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2011-11-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136g (0.30 pounds) | 265g (0.58 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $499 |