Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FC150 was unveiled 20 months earlier than the WB210 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the WB210 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Samsung WB210. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-FC150 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-FC150
| WB210 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 20 months |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung WB210
| EX-FC150 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC150 and the WB210.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and WB210 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The photograph here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and WB210.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB210 to show extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-11-16 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173g (0.38 lbs) | 174g (0.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $350 | $279 |