Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f272/1f272bd1a138ca84276ad9995fc74f68f03e2aa7" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fee81/fee81e019f95a3bb973073789d3f212cc23f50fb" alt="Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-FC150 was revealed 4 years before the WB30F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-FC150 matches up vs the WB30F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung WB30F
EX-FC150 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-FC150
WB30F | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 38 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung WB30F
EX-FC150 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 has got external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC150 against the WB30F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cc0e/1cc0e7893f010f88dfe9b28519430da8efc26734" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and WB30F is 93 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49af6/49af6a1c45d2d73b689766d4d162d1a92aa05beb" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and WB30F.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB30F to produce greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dd6c/8dd6cbd21b3b4d1a2919565cf094c46f996ffb79" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69331/69331bbf12c3c39adfb554a435c617822e608fec" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung WB30F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-11-16 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $350 | $180 |