Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC150 was revealed 5 years before the WB35F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-FC150 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-FC150
| WB35F | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-FC150 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC150 features outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the WB35F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC150 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to deliver greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-11-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $130 |