Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB750
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-FC150 versus Samsung WB750, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FC150 was launched 21 months prior to the WB750 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the WB750 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-FC150 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-FC150
| WB750 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 21 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung WB750
| EX-FC150 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC150 versus Samsung WB750 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the WB750.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and WB750 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC150 and WB750.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB750 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $339 |