Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Sigma. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FC150 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-FC150 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-FC150 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-FC150
DP2 Quattro | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | November 2009 | Fresher by 51 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-FC150 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 features physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the DP2 Quattro.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and DP2 Quattro.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-FC150 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will deliver greater detail having an extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-11-16 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 173g (0.38 pounds) | 395g (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-40 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $350 | $931 |