Casio EX-FC150 vs Sony T900
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC150 vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FC150 was manufactured 10 months after the T900 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-FC150 matches up versus the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC150 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Sony T900
| EX-FC150 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2009 | February 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-FC150
| T900 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Sony T900
| EX-FC150 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FC150 versus Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the T900.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and T900 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and T900.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony T900 to give greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-FC150 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-11-16 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173g (0.38 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $350 | $300 |