Casio EX-FH100 vs Casio EX-ZR300
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Casio EX-FH100 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
Casio EX-FH100 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FH100 and Casio EX-ZR300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Casio. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and EX-ZR300 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH100 was manufactured 23 months prior to the EX-ZR300 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FH100 matches up versus the EX-ZR300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Casio EX-ZR300
EX-FH100 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Casio EX-FH100
EX-ZR300 | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | June 2010 | Newer by 23 months | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Casio EX-ZR300
EX-FH100 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR300 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FH100 and Casio EX-ZR300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FH100 and the EX-ZR300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and EX-ZR300 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and EX-ZR300.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to give extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH100 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2012-05-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Exilim Engine HS |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $299 | $329 |