Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak C140
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak C140 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-FH100 and Kodak C140, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and C140 (8MP) and the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") have totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FH100 was launched 18 months later than the C140 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the C140 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Kodak EasyShare C140. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Kodak C140
| EX-FH100 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 | January 2009 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Casio EX-FH100
| C140 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Kodak C140
| EX-FH100 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 has got outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Kodak C140 has measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH100 and Kodak C140 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the C140.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and C140 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The visual below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH100 and C140.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-FH100 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Casio EX-FH100 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-FH100 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 13cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $299 | $80 |