Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak M580
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
90 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak M580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Announced July 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak M580 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-FH100 versus Kodak M580, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and M580 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FH100 was announced 11 months after the M580 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-FH100 matches up vs the M580 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak M580 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Kodak EasyShare M580. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Kodak M580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Kodak M580
| EX-FH100 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Casio EX-FH100
| M580 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Kodak M580
| EX-FH100 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak M580 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 has got exterior measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Kodak M580 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH100 versus Kodak M580 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH100 and the M580.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and M580 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak M580 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and M580.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Kodak M580 to offer you extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher EX-FH100 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak M580 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak M580 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Kodak EasyShare M580 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Kodak EasyShare M580 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $299 | $169 |