Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon S5300
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
95 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon S5300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Launched January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon S5300 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Nikon S5300, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and S5300 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FH100 was announced 4 years earlier than the S5300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-FH100 scores versus the S5300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon S5300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Nikon Coolpix S5300. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Nikon S5300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Nikon S5300
| EX-FH100 | S5300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Casio EX-FH100
| S5300 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 43 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Nikon S5300
| EX-FH100 | S5300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon S5300 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 comes with physical dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Nikon S5300 has dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Nikon S5300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH100 against the S5300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and S5300 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon S5300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the gap between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and S5300.
As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Nikon S5300 to offer you extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon S5300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon S5300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Nikon Coolpix S5300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Nikon Coolpix S5300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-208mm (8.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.7-6.6 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 138g (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $299 | $180 |