Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon W300
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Announced May 2017
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon W300 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-FH100 versus Nikon W300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Nikon. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and W300 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FH100 was launched 8 years prior to the W300 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-FH100 grades against the W300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon W300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Nikon Coolpix W300. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Nikon W300
| EX-FH100 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Casio EX-FH100
| W300 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 84 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Nikon W300
| EX-FH100 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH100 comes with external measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Nikon W300 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH100 versus Nikon W300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH100 against the W300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and W300 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and W300.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon W300 to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FH100 vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2017-05-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 231g (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 280 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Built-in |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $299 | $387 |