Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus FE-4030
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus FE-4030, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and FE-4030 (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH100 was unveiled 6 months later than the FE-4030 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-FH100 scores against the FE-4030 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus FE-4030 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Olympus FE-4030. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Olympus FE-4030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus FE-4030
| EX-FH100 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Casio EX-FH100
| FE-4030 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus FE-4030
| EX-FH100 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | January 2010 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 enjoys outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4030 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus FE-4030 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the FE-4030.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and FE-4030 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and FE-4030.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus FE-4030 to provide you with more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus FE-4030 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus FE-4030 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lb) | 146g (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $299 | $130 |