Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34


88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Replaced the Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and SH-2 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-FH100 was released 5 years before the SH-2 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the SH-2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus SH-2
EX-FH100 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Casio EX-FH100
SH-2 | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2015 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 57 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus SH-2
EX-FH100 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 has external measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH100 and the SH-2.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and SH-2 is 92 and 88 respectively.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and SH-2.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-2 to show more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 grams (0.44 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $299 | $399 |