Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus 8000
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus 8000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FH100 was released 12 months after the 8000 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-FH100 scores versus the 8000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus 8000
| EX-FH100 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Casio EX-FH100
| 8000 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus 8000
| EX-FH100 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 has got outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus 8000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH100 compared to the 8000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and 8000 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and 8000.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus 8000 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger EX-FH100 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lb) | 182g (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $380 |