Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-310
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus TG-310, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FH100 was released 6 months before the TG-310 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-FH100 matches up vs the TG-310 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus TG-310
| EX-FH100 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Casio EX-FH100
| TG-310 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus TG-310
| EX-FH100 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 | January 2011 | Same generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 comes with outside dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the TG-310.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and TG-310 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and TG-310.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-310 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $299 | $0 |