Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH100 was introduced 19 months prior to the TG-320 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-FH100 scores against the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus TG-320
| EX-FH100 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-FH100
| TG-320 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus TG-320
| EX-FH100 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 offers physical dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH100 and the TG-320.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and TG-320.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to offer more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $299 | $0 |