Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34


90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-FH100 was revealed 5 years before the TG-4 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-FH100 matches up versus the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus TG-4
EX-FH100 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Casio EX-FH100
TG-4 | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 58 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus TG-4
EX-FH100 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH100 provides external dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the TG-4.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and TG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The photograph below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and TG-4.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to offer more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $299 | $379 |