Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH100 was launched 8 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-FH100 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | November 2009 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-FH100
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-FH100 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 provides outside dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 92 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The photograph below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH100 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will give greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-FH100 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 lb) | 453g (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $299 | $566 |