Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly close but the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FH100 was released 3 months prior to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FH100 matches up against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-FH100 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Casio EX-FH100
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-FH100 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | September 2010 | Same generation | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 offers external measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-FH100 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lb) | 140 gr (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $299 | $566 |