Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced August 2011
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is very well matched but the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH100 was announced 13 months before the GXR Mount A12 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-FH100 grades vs the GXR Mount A12 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-FH100 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-FH100
GXR Mount A12 | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | June 2010 | More recent by 13 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-FH100 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 has physical measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has specifications of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the GXR Mount A12.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and GXR Mount A12 is 92 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-FH100 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 will give you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2011-08-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 9.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 370 grams (0.82 lbs) |
Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $299 | $349 |