Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-20
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-20, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WG-20 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH100 was announced 4 years prior to the WG-20 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-FH100 matches up vs the WG-20 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Ricoh WG-20. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-FH100 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-FH100
| WG-20 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 44 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-FH100 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 has outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-20 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the WG-20.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and WG-20 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH100 and WG-20.
As you have seen, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-20 to offer more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 164 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $370 |