Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH100 was announced 5 years prior to the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the WG-5 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-FH100 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Casio EX-FH100
WG-5 GPS | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | June 2010 | Newer by 56 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-FH100 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 features outer measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-FH100 and the WG-5 GPS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to provide extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 14.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $299 | $500 |